All news is rigorously fact-checked and reviewed by leading blockchain experts and seasoned industry insiders.
- Aave service providers have proposed a 25,000 ETH contribution to DeFi United to help repair the rsETH shortfall caused by the Kelp DAO exploit.
- The move would add Aave to a growing stack of ecosystem-backed contributions, following earlier proposals from Lido and Ether.fi.
Aave may soon commit a large chunk of treasury capital to the DeFi recovery effort taking shape around the Kelp DAO exploit.
In a governance proposal published Friday, Aave service providers asked the DAO to contribute 25,000 ETH, worth roughly $58 million, to DeFi United, a coordinated effort aimed at restoring the missing backing behind rsETH after last week’s bridge compromise.
Aave’s proposal would target the remaining rsETH hole
The mechanics of the incident are now familiar, though no less damaging for that. The attacker minted unbacked rsETH through a compromised LayerZero bridge, then used it as collateral on Aave to borrow real assets. That left the lending protocol with a significant bad debt problem and pushed the fallout well beyond Kelp itself.
Aave’s proposed contribution would go specifically toward closing the remaining shortfall tied to that exploit. That distinction matters. This is not framed as a general donation to the ecosystem or a symbolic gesture of support. It is meant to plug a very real gap that has already created pressure across lending markets, leveraged positions and restaking-related collateral loops.
The move would also be unusually direct. Aave is not merely helping a partner protocol from a safe distance. It is responding to an exploit that hit its own balance sheet through contaminated collateral.
Other major protocols are already stepping in
The proposal lands as DeFi United begins to look more like a serious recovery consortium than an improvised rescue thread.
On Thursday, Lido DAO proposed contributing up to 2,500 ETH, while Ether.fi put forward as much as 5,000 ETH. Aave’s 25,000 ETH proposal would be much larger than either, and would likely become the central pillar of the funding package if approved.
That says something important about how the industry is reading the event. The Kelp exploit is no longer being treated as an isolated bridge failure. It is being handled as a systemic liquidity and collateral problem that threatens to spread if left unresolved.
For Aave governance, the decision now is fairly stark. Either commit major DAO resources to stabilize the damage, or risk a longer period where bad debt and shaken collateral assumptions keep hanging over one of DeFi’s biggest lending markets.
